Amelie Van Impe vs Giulia Crescenzi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Van Impe vs G. Crescenzi

Amelie Van Impe
BEL
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
29
-
Height
-
607
C. Rank
885
456
Best Rank
740
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Giulia Crescenzi
ITA
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
29
-
Height
-
607
C. Rank
885
456
Best Rank
740
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Impe 1 - 0 Crescenzi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amelie Van Impe winning 2 and Giulia Crescenzi winning 0. The last match between Amelie Van Impe and Giulia Crescenzi was at the W15 Wanfercee-Baulet, 25-08-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Amelie Van Impe getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Impe | 1 |
| Crescenzi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Wanfercee-Baulet(08-25-22)
Amelie Van Impe
7
6
Giulia Crescenzi
5
2
A. V. Impe vs G. Crescenzi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.06% (123-69) | Career Total W/L | 48.91% (157-164) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. V. Impe vs G. Crescenzi Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Amelie Van Impe has won 41.91% of points on their second serve, while Giulia Crescenzi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Amelie Van Impe, in recent form, has won 46.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Giulia Crescenzi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.19% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Amelie Van Impe has saved 53.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Giulia Crescenzi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Amelie Van Impe has won 64.62% of matches played (W/L 42/23), with Giulia Crescenzi winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Amelie Van Impe has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 76/37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/10). Giulia Crescenzi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 77/84), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/63).
- Player level: In the last year, Amelie Van Impe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.05% of matches (W/L 29/13), where as Giulia Crescenzi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Amelie Van Impe winning 1 times and Giulia Crescenzi being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Amelie Van Impe winning 2 and Giulia Crescenzi winning 0.
- The last match between Amelie Van Impe and Giulia Crescenzi was at the W15 Wanfercee-Baulet, 25-08-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Amelie Van Impe getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Amelie Van Impe has played against opponents with an average rank of 399.94 while Giulia Crescenzi has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Amelie Van Impe has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Giulia Crescenzi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Amelie Van Impe has converted 41.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Giulia Crescenzi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Amelie Van Impe vs Giulia Crescenzi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. V. Impe vs G. Crescenzi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:34:0 | Average Match Time | 1:34:0 |
| 63% (37/59) | 1st Serve % | 54% (30/56) |
| 70% (26/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (24/30) |
| 64% (14/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (8/26) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 43% (24/56) | Return Points Win % | 32% (19/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Impe 45%, Crescenzi 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Impe 56%, Crescenzi 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Impe 52%, Crescenzi 0%.
A. V. Impe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-2 10-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
G. Crescenzi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||

A. V. Impe vs G. Crescenzi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.06% (123/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.91% (157/164) |
| 62.73% (276/164) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.09% (352/365) |
| 55.23% (2198/1782) | Games Win/Loss | 50.33% (3263/3220) |
| 61.82% (34/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.36% (59/63) |
| 67.26% (76/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.83% (77/84) |
| 54.17% (13/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.26% (21/17) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 206 | Aces Total | 250 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 548 | Total Double Faults | 746 |
| 1:33:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 477.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.46 |
| 65% (7315/11335) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7846/12133) |
| 61% (4437/7315) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4607/7846) |
| 46% (1845/4020) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1849/4286) |
| 51% (784/1542) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (719/1522) |
| 48% (5546/11548) | Return Points Win % | 45% (5644/12500) |
| 53.33% (40/35) | Challenger W/L | 34.29% (12/23) |
| 70.94% (83/34) | Futures W/L | 50.70% (145/141) |
| 65% (123/190) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (154/314) |
| 58% (22/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (23/47) |
| 48% (28/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (42/82) |
| 86% (127/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (155/135) |
| 14% (127/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (155/20) |
| 22% (65/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (166/23) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction11:05 AM 20/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 21/11/25
Prediction12:05 PM 20/11/25
Prediction11:05 AM 20/11/25
Prediction03:15 AM 21/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:05
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal